that mean yes ? I dont care that u disagre with me cuz u not privide alternatives ? U siply dont bring anything to discusion other than u disagree ? As well u show that holding land and not playing is great is 100% correct and nothing should be changd. yea great gj sorry but its failure idea on many levels.
I long time alo already give up with this topic but looks like some ppl are scared. Do you got alts multiple accounts holding land or something should i actualy go and check ?
I think Kamikage can read just fine. He brought his point of view to the table and from what I gather he finds you to be arguing your point to people that do not share it. He also added that that this is a non-existant problem and dosnt share your solution to this manufactured problem. So to say he brought nothing to the discussion is false.
I mean lets be real here. Is there an argument to be made regarding the current system that would change "your" view or others that share it? If not then going into this thread the idea of "discussion" is flawed.
There is not a easy solution to the problem you presented. The Devs would have to invest a lot of time/energy to "re-work this system" that has been an issue on every AA server that I have played. There will always be players that login to pay taxes to hold land and yea it sucks if they are not active. Then who decides what is "active enough" because they are playing the game long enough to make tax certs to pay taxes. So where does the line get drawn? Who decides how long I play or when i play?
The real difficulty is that a "re-work" presents more problems than it solves and though the current system has flaws it is the best option we have.
I think "threatening to look into players" that hold land is a bit much dont you think? I mean you can look at me all you want but if that statement was made toward me in the way you did I would not like that. I would wonder "Who the fuck do you think you are?" How would you look into it in a conclusive way without having admin authority or to make the statement to begin with. If I were that player I would tell you to go fak yourself for making such a statement.
Last thing, I believe there are bigger problems than land that you and others could lobby against or "Look into". How do you feel about inactive players holding castles? I mean in my view good on them for keeping it if no one can take it and they login to do the min required to keep the Castle. How is that really that much different than the land issue from your point of view? I believe them both to be in the same ballpark of people using a current system to hold something they want. But that can be a separate thread of course.
What make this situation a bit worse is there is a RUMOR that SOME not all players benefiting from Castle profits are RMT them for gold to RMT on AAU for gold. Now this is a RUMOR that has being stated by lots of people and has been the word on the street. So if you want to make a difference and "look into something" I believe that would be a better use of time to check out. So start a new thread to tackle that issue because there is no way you have not heard that being said or..... Go see who is holding land on multiple accounts, your call.
